Movie Reviews. Book Reviews. Culture Analysis. And More

Month: March 2022

Upload: Upping the Game for these Hoes

I really enjoyed the first season of this Amazon Prime show, so the second season had a lot to prove. Greg Daniels has created countless incredible projects, so it’s not a surprise that this new venture is doing well. Upload’s first season has an 88% Critics Rating on Rotten Tomatoes and an 87% Audience score. Although the second season has significantly fewer reviews, the approval rating is going in the same direction.

I think I’m in the same boat with these reviewers.

The second season picks up right where the first season left us, but then we get a three-week time jump. I have conflicted feelings about this. On one hand, I see how this takes us back to the main storyline quicker. On the other hand, I’m intrigued to know more about this technology-less encampment and wish we had spent more time there dissecting its politics. Maybe in the third season, there will be more room to explore this part of the show’s sight for the future – I’m hoping so. I think the idea of a religious cult with a leader that has anarchist ideologies towards technology leaves a lot to be explored and endless means for writers to make current cultural criticisms.

I appreciate that Aleesha has been given a little more screen time and crusts of a storyline compared to the crumbs of last season. However, I still think that this show is greatly underusing Zainab Johnson. She’s a comedic and dramatic wizard who steals every scene she’s in. I want more!

Upload - Aleesha

They’ve somehow made Ingrid [Allegra Edwards] more annoying than she was last season. I know that’s the point of her character; she’s out of touch with reality, and her wealth gives her the power to control her ex-boyfriend’s life. Upload does a great job of making the viewer hate the rich. And I know this is a half-hour show; I know what that means in terms of limited space for nuance. However, I still feel that Ingrid, and the majority of the other representations of the ultra-rich, are portrayed as cartoonishly evil and unhinged. I think this representation does the message of the show a disservice. Even the ultra-rich have their moments of humanity – that’s what keeps them on top – kindness at the right moment. I think this show could use a smidgen of more humanity coming from its villains and performances that actually garner sympathy. Adding that kind of nuance will hit the message a homerun.

Upload - Ingrid

Nora’s [Andy Allo] story takes an interesting turn when she hooks up with Matteo [Paulo Costanzo]. I liked that Nora was taking on more rebellion, but I was sad when she was sucked back into the corporate system. It felt like Nora’s character evolved and then regressed. Matteo’s arc felt too sharp, as well. Their story together is why I wish we had more time in the three-week time jump.

Upload - Nora and Matteo

Nathan [Robbie Amell] maintains being simultaneous: smart and a dumbass. I admire the loyalty to the character’s roots, but I wish he had more moments of “Eureka!”. He is supposed to be a brilliant coder, but the most we see him code is with the glitches and tools Nora gave him.

All criticisms aside, I enjoy this show: I like its concept and direction, I think the performers are great, the writers are doing a great job. I think this season’s cliffhangers are setting up a promising season three.

Side note: I think it is bonkers how many Amazon Prime Originals are about inhumane crimes committed by the ultra-rich when considering who owns the entire company.

You know what, Bezos, keep your enemies close, right?

Euphoria! Except…no. It’s not.

Season one of this ICONIC HBO show introduced the powerful characters and plotlines in this colourful, psychedelic world. We get character-specific episodes with background, drama, and beautiful cinematography.

Season two of this show starts with a bang and fizzles out with sparks here and there. It does not come close to the storytelling of the first season. There are various characters whose storylines are either left completely unresolved or sloppily taped together. Character decisions contradict the development in Season one. Sam Levinson knows how to frame a beautiful shot and delivers strong character moments, but he does not excel at overall story. It has become clear to me and many of the show’s fans that Sam is in over his head and needs help in the writer’s room.

In Season One, the character of Chris McKay [Algee Smith] had dedicated episode time to his backstory and his future. In Season Two, his character is essentially abandoned by episode two. We never hear from him again. Or his brothers, which is a serious missed opportunity for dropping story hints of a Euphoria gen ii focusing on them and Gia Bennett (the MC’s sister). Sam missed the opportunity to create a streamline into an iconic anthological series like UK Skins. McKay’s disappearance is also exceedingly disappointing because he is one of the mere sprinkles of POC characters on this show.

Euphoria - McKay

Kat Hernandez [Barbie Ferreira] is the only plus-size character on the show and her background/arc of Season One was a massive fan favourite. Yet, in Season Two, she’s barely a side character. We get one powerful scene where she’s imagining all the voices of internet influencers in her head creating this messy representation of the body positivity movement corrupted by skinnies. Then nothing. She breaks up with her incredible boyfriend who loves to eat puss-puss and dance. Then nothing. She dances on cam in her little black mask [iconic] for two seconds. Then nothing. She’s there when shit goes down, but she doesn’t do anything. There are rumours that Kat’s plotline took a darker route this season which Barbie disagreed with, so Sam cut down her role significantly. WOW. Disappointing.

Euphoria - Kat

Jules [Hunter Schafer] and Rue [Zendaya] are broken apart by a man… but not really, ultimately it’s Rue’s addiction that pushed Jules away. In my opinion, Elliot [Dominic Fike] was just…there. I think that Sam Levinson did an okay job presenting Rue’s addiction as it worsened. However, following episode five, one of the best episodes to date, it gravitates towards a hopeful outlook on addiction rather than a truthful one. After watching her father’s funeral dramatized on a stage only a week sober, you’re telling me she didn’t even try to relapse? If the point of Rue staying sober for the rest of the school year was to say that Lexi’s play gave Rue this whole new perspective, I need to SEE it. There are also numerous plotlines left wide open, i.e., her debts and memories lost. What happened in the hours between that bath with the massive morphine dose and waking up in the bed?

Like, oh my God. Okay, we get it. Cassie [Sydney Sweeney] fucked Nate [Jacob Elordi] because she’s depressed, insecure, and has subconscious male gaze ideologies about her value. Cassie wants Maddy’s [Alexa Demie] confidence – she wants the “unconditional love” that Maddy and Nate supposedly had. So, Cassie does her best to become Maddy or a version of Maddy that Nate wants. Not that complicated. He could have spent less time on that triangle and given us a better Kat storyline. Whatever.

Lexi! Lexi, Lexi, Lexi [Maude Apatow]. An icon. Sam did something right with her character. And that play?! AMAZING! Great character choices. The episodes with the play… a bit of a rerun. We get a little more backstory on Lexi, her relationship with the other characters and her trauma. It was a clever round-up of the story. However, it was repetitive in the grand scheme of both seasons and had no reason encompassing almost two entire episodes.

Euphoria - Lexi's Play

Sam Levinson wrote a beautiful backstory for Cal Jacobs [Eric Dane]. BUT a redemption arc for this character is not what the overall story needs. Understanding his motivations? Fine. Trying to make me feel sorry for the consequences of his actions because of that past? Unnecessary. He’s an adult. He made his choices. Also, as far as I’m aware, the United States law doesn’t arrest people who purchase prostitution services. They arrest those offering the services. In that case, the only evidence (THAT WE KNOW OF) Nate could have given to the police and have Cal arrested would be the video of Cal and Jules in the motel. However, in episode six, Nate gives Jules the DVD of that night and tells her it’s the original and there are no copies. Maybe Nate lied, but I don’t know for certain because the show didn’t clarify… What is Cal being arrested for, Sam?

My theory is that Sam Levinson wrote a season and ran into issues with the cast about the script. Maybe he already had a shooting start date and had to rewrite fast. I imagine that he didn’t have a chance to think things through until he was in the editing room with the footage he had shot. That’s why some of the episodes have lots of filler shots that set a ~vibe~ because Sam hadn’t written enough usable story. I also think that may be why some of the old plotlines from season one ended up with fast and messy conclusions.

I think I still like the show. I’m rooting for the characters. I want to see Rue figure her shit out, although I also want her addiction portrayed honestly and her narration explained by her eventual death at some point. And this all hinges on what Sam does with the third season. If he can’t flesh out the characters he abandoned and wrap up plot holes he forgot, I’m out.

Quick shout out to the incredible performances from the actors contributing to this project. They have done incredible things with what they’re given.

Jared Leto devil

13 Reason Why I Despise Jared Leto

This is a slam piece. This is an opinion piece. What I am about to write is highly biased against the subject. I do not like Jared Leto. I don’t know him personally; I can’t testify to his true character. What I have is a series of articles, accusations, internet here-say, and analysis of his work that adds up to me – the author of this slam piece – relaying the reasons why I dislike Jared Leto.

It all started as a bad vibe. Yes, I didn’t like his vibe. I can’t pinpoint exactly when it happened, it wasn’t like I was keeping tabs on how this person was making me feel. I think he wasn’t on my radar and then he was gradually on my radar more and more and that’s how I released “I don’t like this guy”.

Jared Leto has had numerous scandals throughout his career.

I haven’t been highly present for most of them. His career started before I was born, April 1996 — My So-Called Life first aired in August 1994. He’s been around longer than I have witnessed, maybe that’s part of why I detest him so much, I wasn’t part of the culture that adored him and saw his charm.

Jared Leto in My So-Called Life

What I do know about that time – the time before I noticed who he was – is from research I did for this piece. A New York Post article from 2005 alludes to Jared Leto as insistent on getting with underage models, their source said, “Jared has been hitting on all of them,” [underage models staying at a hotel], they call him a “serial texter” and attest that “It’s really kind of creepy.” The New York Post is a mainstream tabloid airing this story, a testimonial to Jared Leto’s pedophilic nature, but seemingly the only one to do so.

Other inklings of Jared Leto’s preference for underage girls are spread across the remanence of old message boards and spun into hear-say from the people who were there to see it. There is just one post from a woman who writes a first-person account of being coerced by Jared Leto. However, I will be the first to say these are not certifiable sources. I am all for believing women, but I cannot tell you that these things happened. I can tell you that I’ve noticed others online not finding it that hard to believe Jared Leto could have done these things.

BLIND ITEMS

There are multiple Blind Items on Crazy Days and Nights where entertainment lawyer “Enty” calls out Jared Leto’s predatory behaviour: Blind item – Aug. 2018, Blind item – Jan. 2021, Blind item – Dec. 2021. The most incriminating Blind is the one from December last year, it accuses Jared Leto of buying up a message board archive that contains first-person accounts of his [alleged] assaults. Again, it’s hard to say how credible this information is because it is from an anonymous site. Although, Enty did write about Nxivm, Harvey Weinstein, and Jeffery Epstein long before they were publicly outed and brought to justice… so, make of that what you will.

One of the most concrete pieces of evidence of Jared Leto’s open Hollywood secret of favouring underage girls is from a Twitter exchange between two celebrities. Dylan Sprouse tweeted, “Yo @JaredLeto now that you’ve slid into the dm’s of every female model aged 18-25, what would you say your success rate is?” to which James Gunn replied, “He starts at 18 on the Internet?” [this tweet has since been deleted] Even though half of this interaction is no longer available on the social media site, the fact that it ever existed is pretty bold for two people to talk about publicly without any knowledge that this behaviour is real.

James Gunn Dylan Sprouse Twitter exchange

Speaking of predatory behaviour.

In 2013, 30 Seconds to Mars held a fan contest where the winner got to spend the night in Jared Leto’s bed. The contest page on their website no longer exists, but from what I’ve read, there didn’t seem to be an age restriction on entering the contest… Anyway-

Among all that, Jared Leto has exhibited poor behaviour towards castmates. MTV put out an article in 2016 with an exhaustive list of all the “method acting” gifts he bestowed upon his co-stars in Suicide Squad; the list includes a dead pig, sticky nude magazines, used condoms, a live rat, anal beads, and more. Jared Leto has since denied his own statements about the “gifts” he gave to castmates. If I might insert my own statement here – I think he’s covering his ass. I think Jared Leto thought because he had an Oscar he could do no wrong as an “artist”; he didn’t think that the internet would turn against him. I think he was media advised to redact his earlier statements and talk about newer projects [House of Gucci] in a much different tone.

Fat Suit

Jared Leto Clown

Speaking of newer projects, his most recent film House of Gucci has a mixed bag of reviews. I haven’t seen the film; I don’t care to see the film. Why? I don’t care to support the career of a man I detest. What I will say, from what I’ve read on Slate and Vulture, is that Jared Leto’s performance was [supposedly] cartoonish, and lacklustre. I stand by the notion that casting directors should maybe consider hiring people with the same bodies as those they are supposed to play. I don’t think there’s too much harm in a fake nose (depending on the performance), but I do believe putting on a fat suit is entirely unnecessary when there’s a long list of plus-sized actors out there. I also think that if a character’s size is informing your acting choices to represent that person as clownish when fact paints a different picture, you were the wrong choice for the role.

Transmisogyny

Jared Leto in Dallad buyers Club

Jared Leto has a history of poorly portraying characters he doesn’t understand. His Oscar-winning performance in Dallas Buyer’s Club is certainly one of those times. This movie I have seen, and at the time, admittedly, I, along with many people, thought it revolutionary. However, I hadn’t yet graduated High School and lacked nuanced perspectives in critical analysis. What I will say now is along the lines of this Time article. Jared Leto performed a caricature of what Hollywood thinks a transwoman is. She is reduced to sexual desire, greed, vanity. She is poor, she is uneducated. She is the charity case Hollywood wishes to represent and save.

This performance was a chance for Hollywood to clap for themselves. The casting director could have hired a transwoman for this role, but I doubt she would have given this movie an Oscar so perhaps that’s why. We must acknowledge the trans community’s response to his casting as well: see Time and The Guardian. The term “transmisogyny” is new to me, but I think it describes this entire scenario and pop culture moment.

On to the outlandish:

Jared Leto and his bandmates started a cult [Blend Magazine, L’Officiel, Distractify, YouTube]. It started as a “joke” because a journalist said 30 Second to Mars had a “cult following”, and now this luxury private island yoga retreat is referred to as a “cult”. There are no vengeful attendees, there’s no scandal to escape this exclusive getaway – and to this, I am relieved. So, what’s there to hate? You might ask. Well, to that I say, how about everything? How can a group of musicians become so self-entitled that they charge their loyalist of fans upwards of $2000 for a meet and greet they can’t leave? What’s also crazy is that it’s just one band. The activities at that price feel appropriate if there was a lineup of different musicians, but it isn’t. Its. Just. One. Band.

30secs2mars cult

What also grinds my gears about this venture for Jared Leto and his bandmates is that it feels like they’re making a mockery of their fandom. Cults prey on a certain kind of person, or a person in a certain emotional place; vulnerable and seeking but lacking critical comprehension due to a distrust in themselves. For 30 Seconds to Mars to call their fanbase a cult, they’re insinuating that their fanbase has no interest in having a mind of their own, insinuating that their fans blindly follow their leaders, are pliable. With that and the outrageous prices they’re charging, I think you’ve got a group of middle-aged men manipulating their fanbase into a form of worship and devotion that looks an awful lot like a toxic one-sided relationship instead of a fluid connection between artist and admirer.

Are you convinced?

Jared Leto, in my opinion, gets too much praise and not enough scrutiny. I think someone with a career that long, with numerous, substantial revenue streams, a healthy management team with no doubt a stack of highly sought-after lawyers, and an aspired “cult” fanbase is someone to be feared. I think his actions need to be unpacked, and I think he’s gone too long without a reality check. I don’t like Jared Leto, and that dislike is not entirely unfounded yet not entirely backed with credible insight. What can I say? I got a bad vibe.

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén